I have spent hours, and I mean hours, trying to upload pictures to the kodak website because you can get calendars made there. Well, apparently every single picture of Sergio and Jose Maria on the internet is of low resolution and poor quality. Every single one.
I refuse to believe that professional photographers use bad cameras. Kodak just sucks.
4 comments:
Well it's probably not that they use bad cameras, it's that images for web delivery just don't need to be hi res (like for printing). It just eats up bandwidth.
My gallery images are all 7.1 megapixels and 3000x2000+ pixels but my image size online is only 480px wide.
You want to put the "hole spitter" on a calendar? We'd better have a discussion about that one.
Oh one other thing...
KODAK SUCKS. I have two friends who try to use their answer to iPhoto on their computers and it's proprietary garbage!
Dump it!
I think I'm going to keep my kodak digital cameras and printers and just not use their software.
And the 'hole spitter' is a handsome guy. Right now at work, I have a paper cut out of him that I tape to every new golf picture on my monthly calendar. Do I at least get points for wanting Jose Maria Olazabal on the calendar too?
I would reccomend not using ANYTHING from Kodak. My experience has been that Kodak cameras take descent pictures but, they use cheap parts and their cameras fail often. The software is a resource hog and is also buggy.
Post a Comment